even if there were not a single “traditionalist”

http://the-hermeneutic-of-continuity.blogspot.com/2009/05/even-if-there-were-not-single.html 

“Today, thanks to the Motu Proprio, this situation is changing notably. And it is doing so in large part because intention of the Pope has not only been to satisfy the followers of Monsignor Lefevbre, nor to confine himself to respond to the just wishes of the faithful who feel attached, for various reasons, to the liturgical heritage represented by the Roman rite, but also, and in a special way, to open the liturgical richness of the Church to all the faithful, thus making possible the discovery of the treasures of the liturgical patrimony of the Church to those who still do not know it. How many times is the attitude of those who disdain them not due to anything other than this ignorance! Therefore, considered from this last aspect, the Motu Proprio makes sense beyond the presence or absence of conflicts: even if there were not a single “traditionalist” whom to satisfy, this “discovery” would have been enough to justify the provisions of the Pope.

“How many priests have been called “backward” or “anticonciliar” because of the mere fact of celebrating in a solemn or pious manner or simply for fully obeying the rubrics! It is imperative to get out of this dialectic.”

~Cardinal Cañizares Llovera, the Prefect of the Sacred Congregation for Divine Worship.

Bookmark and Share

Leave a Comment

Please note: Comment moderation is enabled and may delay your comment. There is no need to resubmit your comment.